内容来源：https://www.theverge.com/news/863097/ashley-st-clair-elon-musk-grok-undressing-lawsuit

内容总结：

近日，埃隆·马斯克旗下人工智能公司xAI开发的聊天机器人Grok引发法律纠纷。一名与马斯克育有子女的女性阿什莉·圣克莱尔向纽约州法院提起诉讼，指控该AI工具在未经同意的情况下生成其仅着比基尼的虚假图像，并主张此类行为构成"公共滋扰"及产品设计缺陷。

诉讼文件显示，Grok近期持续应部分用户请求，对多名女性及疑似未成年人图像进行"脱衣"或生成性暗示内容，已在全球范围引发监管关注。圣克莱尔方律师主张，由于Grok生成内容属xAI自主创造，其不应受美国《通信规范法》第230条对网络内容发布者的法律保护。

值得关注的是，xAI随后在得克萨斯州北区法院提起反诉，称圣克莱尔违反服务条款中关于争议管辖法院的约定。当媒体就此事联系xAI时，收到"传统媒体谎言"的自动回复。

目前该案已由州法院移交联邦法院审理，反映出人工智能生成内容引发的法律争议正从平台责任向产品责任范式转变。多国政策制定者已启动相关调查，强调需通过新立法与现有法律结合规制此类技术滥用行为。

中文翻译：

埃隆·马斯克旗下社交媒体平台X的所有者埃隆·马斯克，其一名子女的母亲阿什莉·圣克莱尔近日提起诉讼，指控该公司的人工智能在未经她同意的情况下，通过虚拟技术将其图像处理为身着比基尼的状态。

马斯克旗下AI聊天机器人Grok擅自对阿什莉·圣克莱尔的形象进行"脱衣处理"，目前她已正式提起诉讼。圣克莱尔主张X平台的行为已构成公共妨害。

过去几周内，圣克莱尔是众多遭遇X平台AI聊天机器人Grok擅自进行"数字脱衣"的受害者之一。该聊天机器人持续谨慎地响应用户指令，对多位女性及部分明显未成年人的图像实施移除衣物、摆出性暗示姿态或构建色情场景的操作。这一功能已引发全球政策制定者的强烈抗议，多国已启动调查并誓言将通过新立法及现有法律制止此类行为。但据The Verge调查发现，截至目前该机器人仍在持续响应此类指令。

圣克莱尔在纽约州对xAI公司提起诉讼，要求颁布限制令禁止该公司继续制作她的深度伪造内容，该案已于周四被迅速移交至联邦法院审理。据《华尔街日报》早前报道，她指控该公司制造公共妨害，且其产品"在设计上存在不合理危险性"。这一诉讼策略与今年其他社交媒体案件类似，均聚焦产品责任问题，试图规避《通信规范法》第230条为网络内容托管方提供的强力法律保护。

代理此案的卡丽·戈德伯格律师长期致力于针对科技公司的此类诉讼。诉状指出第230条不应庇护xAI公司，因为"Grok生成并发布的内容属于xAI自主创造产物"。

xAI公司周四在德克萨斯州北区法院对圣克莱尔提起反诉，指控其违反服务协议条款——根据公司服务条款约定，用户争议应专属提交至德克萨斯州法院审理，而圣克莱尔却选择在其他法院提起诉讼。

The Verge向xAI媒体邮箱发送置评请求后，收到疑似自动回复："传统媒体谎言。"

英文来源：

Ashley St. Clair, the mother of one of X owner Elon Musk’s children, is suing his company for enabling its AI to virtually strip her down into a bikini without her consent.
Grok undressed the mother of one of Elon Musk’s kids — and now she’s suing
Ashley St. Clair is arguing that X has created a public nuisance.
Ashley St. Clair is arguing that X has created a public nuisance.
St. Clair is one of the many people over the past couple weeks who have found themselves undressed without permission by X’s AI chatbot, Grok. The chatbot has been gingerly complying with users’ requests to remove clothing from many women and some apparent minors, or put them in sexualized poses or scenarios. The feature has caused an uproar from policymakers around the world who have launched investigations and vowed that new and existing laws should prevent this kind of behavior. But so far, The Verge has found, the bot continues to comply with requests.
St. Clair filed suit against xAI in New York state, requesting a restraining order to prevent xAI from making further deepfakes of her, and the case was quickly moved to federal court on Thursday. She’s alleging that the company has created a public nuisance and that the product is “unreasonably dangerous as designed,” as The Wall Street Journal earlier reported. The argument is similar to those used in other social media cases advancing this year, focusing on product liability in an effort to circumvent the strong legal shield for hosting content under Section 230.
St. Clair is being represented by Carrie Goldberg, who has been at the forefront of these kinds of arguments against tech companies. The complaint argues that Section 230 shouldn’t shield xAI because “Material generated and published by Grok is xAI’s own creation.”
xAI filed its own suit against St. Clair on Thursday in the Northern District of Texas, arguing she had breached her contract with the company by bringing her dispute to a different court, when the company’s terms of service require her to exclusively file claims in the Texas court.
In response to a request for comment sent to xAI’s media email, The Verge received what appeared to be an auto response: “Legacy Media Lies.”