内容来源：https://techcrunch.com/2026/02/10/nearly-half-of-xais-founding-team-has-now-left-the-company/

内容总结：

当地时间周一晚间，xAI联合创始人吴宇怀（Tony Wu）在社交平台X宣布离职，称“是时候开启新篇章了”，并感慨“这是一个充满可能的时代：配备AI的小团队也能移山倒海，重塑可能”。不到24小时后，另一名直接向马斯克汇报的联合创始人Jimmy Ba也发布告别信，感谢马斯克带领团队完成“非凡旅程”，并表示将以朋友身份继续支持xAI。

这两起看似寻常的高管变动，却暴露出xAI核心团队持续流失的隐忧。该公司12人创始团队中已有半数离职，其中近一年内就有5人离开。2024年中，基础设施负责人Kyle Kosic转投OpenAI；2025年2月，谷歌元老Christian Szegedy离职；今年8月，Igor Babuschkin创办风投机构；上月微软出身的Greg Yang则以健康原因为由辞职。

尽管公开表态均显和睦，且公司被SpaceX收购后即将IPO，早期成员获利丰厚，加之当前AI创业融资环境活跃，顶尖研究人员自立门户实属常态，但频繁离职背后仍存在深层隐患。一方面，马斯克以严苛管理著称；另一方面，公司旗舰产品Grok聊天机器人屡现异常行为，图像生成工具更因深伪色情内容泛滥引发法律风险，这些技术层面的摩擦可能加剧团队动荡。

眼下xAI正处关键阶段：IPO在即意味着将面临空前审视，轨道数据中心等宏大计划亟待落地，模型研发竞赛持续白热化。若Grok无法跟上OpenAI等竞争对手的步伐，或将直接影响上市前景。在人才争夺日趋激烈的AI领域，xAI能否稳住阵脚，已成为关乎其未来发展的严峻考验。

中文翻译：

周一晚间，xAI联合创始人吴宇怀（Tony Wu）宣布离职。他在X平台深夜发帖写道："我的新篇章即将开启。这是一个充满无限可能的时代：一支配备人工智能的小团队能够移山填海，重新定义可能性。"

不到一天后，周二下午，直接向马斯克汇报的另一位联合创始人吉米·巴（Jimmy Ba）同样宣布离职。他在X平台发表了诚挚的告别感言："衷心感谢@埃隆·马斯克将我们凝聚于这段非凡旅程。我为xAI团队的成就深感自豪，未来将以朋友身份继续与团队保持紧密联系。"

单看这两则声明，不过是科技公司寻常的人事变动公告。但置于xAI实验室的整体背景下，却构成了令人不安的离职潮图景。这家公司12人创始团队中已有半数成员离开，其中近一年内离职者高达五位。基础设施负责人凯尔·科西克于2024年中转投OpenAI，谷歌元老克里斯蒂安·塞格迪紧随其后于2025年2月离职。去年八月，伊戈尔·巴布什金离创立风险投资机构；上个月，微软前员工格雷格·杨以健康问题为由请辞。

尽管所有分离都被描述为友好分手，且公司成立近三年之际创始人另谋发展实属常情——众所周知马斯克对下属要求严苛，随着SpaceX完成对xAI的收购及未来数月即将启动的IPO，相关人士都将获得可观收益。当前正值AI初创企业融资黄金期，顶尖研究人员自立门户可谓顺理成章。

但背后也存在不和谐因素。公司旗舰产品Grok聊天机器人屡屡出现诡异行为及明显内部干预迹象，这类问题极易在技术团队中引发摩擦。近期xAI图像生成工具的调整更导致平台充斥深度伪造色情内容，引发虽缓慢但切实的法律后果。

无论原因为何，累积效应已敲响警钟。xAI仍有大量未尽事宜，上市后将面临前所未有的严格审视。随着马斯克启动轨道数据中心计划，兑现承诺的压力将与日俱增。模型研发竞赛并未减速，若Grok无法跟上OpenAI和Anthropic的最新进展，IPO进程恐将受挫。

总而言之，当前局势如履薄冰，xAI必须竭尽全力留住每一份AI人才。

英文来源：

Monday night, xAI co-founder Yuhuai (Tony) Wu announced he was leaving the company. “It’s time for my next chapter,” Wu wrote in a late-night post on X. “It is an era with full possibilities: a small team armed with AIs can move mountains and redefine what’s possible.”
Less than a day later, on Tuesday afternoon, xAI co-founder Jimmy Ba, who reported directly to Musk, said that he, too, is bouncing, posting a gracious note on X on his way out. “Enormous thanks to @elonmusk for bringing us together on this incredible journey. So proud of what the xAI team has done and will continue to stay close as a friend of the team,” it read in part.
On their own, both were pretty standard tech departure announcements — but they’re part of a troubling pattern for the lab. Six members of the company’s 12-person founding team have now left the company, with five of the departures coming in just the last year. Infrastructure lead Kyle Kosic left for OpenAI in mid-2024, followed by Google veteran Christian Szegedy in February 2025. This past August, Igor Babuschkin left to found a venture firm, and Microsoft alum Greg Yang departed just last month, citing health issues.
By all accounts, the splits have all been amicable, and there are lots of reasons why, nearly three years in, some founders might decide to move on. Elon Musk is a notoriously demanding boss, and with the SpaceX’s acquisition of xAI complete and an IPO pending in the coming months, everyone involved has a pretty big windfall coming. It’s a great time to be fundraising for an AI startup, so it’s only natural for high-level researchers to want to strike out on their own.
There are also less amicable reasons that might factor in. The company’s flagship product, the Grok chatbot, has struggled with bizarre behavior and apparent internal tampering — the kind of thing that might easily create friction on the technical team. Then there were the recent changes to xAI’s image-generation tools that flooded the platform with deepfake pornography, sparking slow-moving but real legal consequences.
Whatever the cause, the cumulative impact is alarming. There is a lot of work left to do at xAI, and an IPO will bring more scrutiny than the lab has ever faced before. With Musk already spinning up plans for orbital data centers, the pressure to make good on those plans will be intense. The pace of model development isn’t slowing down, and if Grok can’t keep pace with the latest models from OpenAI and Anthropic, the IPO could easily suffer.
In short, the stakes are high, and xAI needs to hold on to all the AI talent it can.