内容来源：https://techcrunch.com/2025/11/22/trump-administration-might-not-fight-state-ai-regulations-after-all/

内容总结：

特朗普政府近期持续推动人工智能监管权集中化，本周总统通过社交媒体发文强调AI行业需建立"单一联邦标准"，以取代各州分散的监管体系。这一表态延续了此前被参议院以99:1高票否决的"十年禁期"条款思路，当时该条款曾被纳入其主导的法案草案。

据披露，白宫转而拟通过行政命令设立"AI诉讼特别工作组"，计划通过司法诉讼挑战各州AI法规，并拟以切断联邦宽带资金作为施压手段。但路透社最新报道显示，该项行政令目前已暂缓签署。若付诸实施，恐将遭遇包括共和党人在内的多方阻力——此前他们已对限制州级监管的提案提出批评。

硅谷在AI监管议题上同样存在分歧，部分行业人士（特别是特朗普政府关联人士）持续抨击Anthropic等企业支持包括加州SB53法案在内的AI安全立法。这场联邦与地方监管权的博弈，折射出美国人工智能治理道路上的深层矛盾。

中文翻译：

特朗普政府正将矛头对准各州的人工智能监管法规。本周总统在社交媒体发文宣称，该行业需要"建立统一的联邦标准，而非拼凑五十个州的监管体系"。此前，特朗普在"宏伟法案"中曾提议对州级人工智能监管实施十年禁令，但该条款最终遭参议院以99比1的投票结果否决。

这一构想随后以新形式重现。据报道，政府正在起草行政命令，拟设立"人工智能诉讼特别工作组"，其使命是通过法律诉讼挑战各州的人工智能法规。据称，对人工智能法规存在争议的州还将面临联邦宽带资金被削减的威胁。

目前路透社报道称该项行政令已被暂缓实施。若签署生效，该命令很可能面临强烈反对，包括来自此前曾批评州级监管禁令提案的共和党人士。

人工智能监管在硅谷同样引发争议。部分行业人士——尤其是特朗普政府官员——正抨击Anthropic等企业支持包括加州SB53法案在内的人工智能安全立法提案。

英文来源：

The Trump administration has been targeting state-level AI regulation, with the president declaring in a social media post this week that the industry needs “one Federal Standard instead of a patchwork of 50 State Regulatory Regimes.”
This comes after a 10-year ban on state AI regulation was initially included in Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill” before ultimately getting removed by the Senate in a 99-1 vote.
The idea then apparently took on a new form, with the administration reportedly drafting an executive order that would establish an AI Litigation Task Force with a mission to challenge state AI laws through lawsuits. States with contested AI laws would also reportedly be threatened with the loss of federal broadband funding.
Now, Reuters reports that the executive order has been put on hold. If signed, the order would probably face significant opposition, including from Republicans who previously criticized the proposed moratorium on state regulation.
AI regulation has also been a controversial topic in Silicon Valley, with some industry figures — especially those in the Trump administration — attacking companies like Anthropic for supporting AI safety bills including California’s SB 53.